Pennsylvania 1813 House of Representatives, Bradford, Luzerne, and Susquehanna Counties

Office:
House of Representatives (State)
Title:
State Representative
Jurisdiction:
State
Label:
Pennsylvania 1813 House of Representatives, Bradford, Luzerne, and Susquehanna Counties
Date:
1813
State:
Pennsylvania
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
House of Representatives/State Representative
Candidates:
Jabez Hyde, Jr., Joseph Pruner, Rosewell Welles, Putnam Catlin
Candidates: Jabez Hyde, Jr.[1]Joseph Pruner[2]Rosewell WellesPutnam Catlin
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanFederalistFederalist
Final Result: [3][4][5]1243117410261013
District of Bradford, Luzerne, and Susquehanna Counties1243117410261031
Bradford County[6][7]201170162153
Canton37332623
Orwell36232326
Towanda49404133
Wyalusing46443028
Wysox33304243
Luzerne County[8]769739694679
Abington27263233
Braintrim19192727
Exeter50453530
Hanover57583027
Huntington76759493
Kingston[9]1551479490
Nescopeck545411
Newport57571414
Nicholson872223
Pittston27274545
Providence42404647
Salem36354140
Sugar Loaf535025
Tunkhannock21186463
Wilkes-Barre[10]5953113107
Windham28283434
Susquehanna County[11][12]273265170181

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Elected.
[3]Rosewell Welles is also listed as Roswell Welles.
[4]The Susquehanna Democrat (Wilkes-Barre, PA) from October 22 refers to the Republican Ticket as the American Party and the Federal Ticket as the Anti-American Ticket.
[5]Due to disputed votes in Susquehanna County, votes from the Chocanut District were not included in the official return. The totals listed here include the votes from the Chocanut District and are therefore higher than the published totals.
[6]Bradford County was created in 1810 from Luzerne and Lycoming Counties but some parts of Bradford continued to vote with Luzerne in this election.
[7]The Susquehanna Democrat (Wilkes-Barre, PA) from October 22, 1813 lists Joseph Pruner with 180 votes in Bradford County.
[8]The Gleaner (Wilkes-Barre, PA) from October 22 lists Jabez Hyde, Jr. with 791 total votes and provides individual township totals which add up to 789 total votes.
[9]The Gleaner (Wilkes-Barre, PA) from October 22 lists Jabez Hyde, Jr. with 168 votes.
[10]The Gleaner (Wilkes-Barre, PA) from October 22 lists Jabez Hyde, Jr. with 166 votes.
[11]Susquehanna County was formed in October 1812 from Luzerne County but some parts of Susquehanna continued to vote with Luzerne in this election.
[12]"In Susquehanna County, the votes in the Chocanut District were not returned agreeably to law, and not in the official return. The following is the result of the Susquehanna Election, including the votes given in the Chocanut, viz:" The Susquehanna Democrat (Wilkes-Barre, PA). October 22, 1813.

References:

The Advertiser (Wilkes-Barre, PA). September 17, 1813.
Bradford Gazette (Towanda, PA). October 17, 1813.
The Democratic Press (Philadelphia, PA). October 20, 1813.
The Gleaner (Wilkes-Barre, PA). October 22, 1813.
The Susquehanna Democrat (Wilkes-Barre, PA). October 22, 1813.
Der Readinger Adler (Reading, PA). October 26, 1813.
The Advertiser (Wilkes-Barre, PA). October 29, 1813.
The Gleaner (Wilkes-Barre, PA). October 29, 1813.
The Susquehanna Democrat (Wilkes-Barre, PA). October 29, 1813.
The Intelligencer, and Weekly Advertiser (Lancaster, PA). October 30, 1813.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.