North Carolina 1800 Electoral College, Edgecombe District

Office:
Electoral College (Federal)
Title:
Elector
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1800 Electoral College, Edgecombe District
Date:
1800
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
Electoral College/Elector
Electors:
Nathan Mayo, Holland Johnson
Electors: Nathan Mayo[1]Holland Johnson
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Presidential Candidate:John Adams / Charles PinckneyThomas Jefferson / Aaron Burr
Final Result: [2][3]13161035
District of Edgecombe--
Beaufort County[4]156295
Edgecombe County202222
Greene County24545
Hyde County[5]224163
Pitt County388209

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Edgecombe District was also known as the 10th Electoral District.
[3]"Col. Nathan Mayo, the Federal candidate, we understand, has a majority of about 220 votes in the counties of Edgecombe, Pitt, Greene and Beaufort, in Hyde county from which we have not heard, it is supposed the votes will be nearly divided." The North-Carolina Journal (Halifax, NC). November 10, 1800.
[4]Many of the sources list Holland Johnson with 307 votes and Nathan Mayo with 268 votes. However, these are often noted as "unofficial" and they do not give Mayo the often cited 220 majority in the four counties.
[5]Many of the sources list Holland Johnson with 173 votes and Nathan Mayo with 277 votes. However, these number are often cited as "unofficial."

References:

The North-Carolina Journal (Halifax, NC). November 10, 1800.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 18, 1800.
American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 19, 1800.
The Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 19, 1800.
South-Carolina State Gazette, and Timothy's Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 19, 1800.
New-Jersey Journal (Elizabethtown, NJ). November 25, 1800.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.