Virginia 1809 U.S. House of Representatives, District 7

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1809 U.S. House of Representatives, District 7
Date:
1809
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Joseph Lewis, Jr., William Tyler
Candidates: Joseph Lewis, Jr.[1]William Tyler
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Final Result: [2]760465
District of Seven760465
Fairfax County146125
Loudoun County[3][4]528143
Prince William County[5][6][7]86197

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"Joseph Lewis, jr. is re-elected by a majority of 297." Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA), May 1, 1809; The Pittsburgh Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA), May 10, 1809; Charleston Courier, May 10, 1809; and, United States' Gazette (Philadelphia, PA), May 4, 1809.
[3]"Loudoun County...Majority, 385." United States' Gazette (Philadelphia, PA). April 17, 1809.
[4]"We are assured that in Loudon [sic], the federal candidate had a majority of 385." Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 19, 1809.
[5]"Alexandria, April 5...The counties of Prince William, Loudoun and Fairfax form a Congressional District. The candidates are William Tyler and Joseph Lewis, jun. The votes on Monday last were for Wm. Tyler (dem) 148 J. Lewis, jun. (fed) 82." The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 11, 1809.
[6]First day totals: Tyler 148; Lewis 82. Final count: Tyler 200 (according to the Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA) and National Intelligencer); Lewis 86.
[7]

References:

Loudoun County Poll Book. Library of Virginia, Richmond.
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). April 5, 1809.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 7, 1809.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 8, 1809.
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). April 10, 1809.
Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD). April 10, 1809.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 11, 1809.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 11, 1809.
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). April 12, 1809.
The Republican (Petersburg, VA). April 12, 1809.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 14, 1809.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 15, 1809.
The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 17, 1809.
Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD). April 17, 1809.
Poulson's American Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). April 17, 1809.
United States' Gazette (Philadelphia, PA). April 17, 1809.
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). April 18, 1809.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 18, 1809.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 18, 1809.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 19, 1809.
Norfolk Gazette and Publick Ledger (Norfolk, VA). April 19, 1809.
The Republican (Petersburg, VA). April 19, 1809.
The Minerva (Raleigh, NC). April 20, 1809.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). April 20, 1809.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 21, 1809.
Norfolk Gazette and Publick Ledger (Norfolk, VA). April 21, 1809.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 21, 1809.
Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD). April 24, 1809.
New-Jersey Telescope (Newark, NJ). April 24, 1809.
Norfolk Gazette and Publick Ledger (Norfolk, VA). April 24, 1809.
The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 26, 1809.
Litchfield Gazette (Litchfield, CT). April 26, 1809.
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). May 1, 1809.
Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD). May 3, 1809.
The Minerva (Raleigh, NC). May 4, 1809.
United States' Gazette (Philadelphia, PA). May 4, 1809.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). May 10, 1809.
The Pittsburgh Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA). May 10, 1809.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.