Tennessee 1823 U.S. House of Representatives, District 6

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Tennessee 1823 U.S. House of Representatives, District 6
Date:
1823
State:
Tennessee
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
James T. Sandford, Andrew Erwin, Alfred M. Harris
Candidates: James T. Sandford[1]Andrew ErwinAlfred M. Harris
Affiliation:
Final Result: [2][3]396827932263
District of Six396827932263
Bedford County11181261352
Giles County[4]521203837
Lincoln County922717445
Town of Big Spring1166653
Town of Cold Water1313237
Crunk's1375140
Town of Fayetteville306338250
Town of Gum Spring1016446
Town of Lynchburg13116619
Maury County1407612629

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Independent Gazette, August 15, 1823, reports 3975 votes for James T. Sandford, 2799 votes for Andrew Erwin, and 2370 votes for Alfred M. Harris.
[3]The Village Messenger (Fayetteville, TN), August 27, 1823, reports 3974 votes for James T. Sandford, 2800 votes for Andrew Erwin, and 2294 votes for Alfred M. Harris.
[4]The Nashville Whig (Nashville, TN). reports 521 votes for James T. Sandford, 203 votes for Andrew Erwin, and 817 votes for Alfred M. Harris.

References:

Original Election Returns. Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville.
The Village Messenger (Fayetteville, TN). August 13, 1823.
Independent Gazette (Franklin, TN). August 15, 1823.
The Nashville Whig (Nashville, TN). August 25, 1823.
The Village Messenger (Fayetteville, TN). August 27, 1823.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). August 29, 1823.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.