Maryland 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5
Date:
1824
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Peter Little, John Barney, Isaac MacKim
Candidates: Peter Little[1]John Barney[2]Isaac MacKim
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [3][4][5][6]968655155346
District of Five968655155346
City of Baltimore[7]627035023443
Ward One376172259
Ward Two558279373
Ward Three809336514
Ward Four712428352
Ward Five367182231
Ward Six401234262
Ward Seven302128223
Ward Eight375238187
Ward Nine417209249
Ward Ten629426262
Ward Eleven[8]553383224
Ward Twelve771487307
Baltimore County[9][10][11][12]341620131903
District of One[13]354221175
District of Two[14]24215791
District of Three[15][16]276150139
District of Four[17]21017841
District of Five[18]287195119
District of Six[19]492258237
District of Seven[20]353114251
District of Eight[21]255138237
District of Nine[22]338261156
District of Ten[23]214179102
District of Eleven[24]18084145
District of Twelve[25]21578210

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Elected.
[3]The October 7th edition of the Daily National Intelligencer and the October 16th of the Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA) list 8603 votes for Peter Little, 5517 votes for John Barney and 5347 votes for Isaac MacKim.
[4]The October 12th edition of the Torch Light and the October 9th edition of the Easton Gazette (Easton, MD) list 7614 votes for Peter Little, 5517 votes for John Barney and 5337 for Isaac MacKim.
[5]The October 12th edition of the The Republican Star, or, General Advertiser (Easton, MD) lists 9685 votes for Peter Little, 5517 votes for John Barney and 5337 for Isaac MacKim.
[6]The October 9th edition of the Maryland Republican lists 5517 votes for John Barney and 5337 votes for Isaac MacKim.
[7]The October 6th edition of the Daily National Intelligencer and the October 8th edition of the Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA) list 6269 votes for Peter Little.
[8]The October 5th edition of the American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD) lists 384 votes for Barney. The October 7th edition lists 383 votes for Barney.
[9]The October 12th edition of the Torch Light lists 1344 votes for Peter Little, 2015 votes for John Barney and 1894 for Isaac MacKim.
[10]The October 12th edition of the The Republican Star, or, General Advertiser (Easton, MD) lists 2015 votes for John Barney and 1894 for Isaac MacKim.
[11]Returns in the October 7th edition of the American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD) were incomplete.
[12]The October 9th edition of the Maryland Republican lists 2015 votes for John Barney and 1894 votes for Isaac MacKim.
[13]Also referred to as Kelly's.
[14]Also referred to as Green's.
[15]Also referred to as Little's.
[16]The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD) is inconclusive for this district.
[17]Also referred to as Woollery's.
[18]Also referred to as Reistertown.
[19]Also referred to as Hessen's.
[20]Also referred to as Govanestown.
[21]Also referred to as Cockey's.
[22]Also referred to as Weis's.
[23]Also referred to as Slade's.
[24]Also referred to as King's.
[25]Also referred to as Johnson's.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Election Summary Sheet, Maryland Hall of Records, Annapolis.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1824.
Baltimore Patriot and Mercantile Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1824.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). October 6, 1824.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 7, 1824.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). October 7, 1824.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). October 8, 1824.
Easton Gazette (Easton, MD). October 9, 1824.
The Maryland Republican and Political and Agricultural Museum (Annapolis, MD). October 9, 1824.
The Reservoir and Public Reflector (Fredericktown, MD). October 11, 1824.
Republican Star, or, General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 12, 1824.
The Torch Light and Public Advertiser (Hagerstown, MD). October 12, 1824.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). October 16, 1824.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.