Virginia 1807 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1807 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10
Date:
1807
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John Dawson, John Mercer
Candidates: John Dawson[1]John Mercer
Affiliation:RepublicanQuid
Final Result: [2][3]--
District of Ten--
Louisa County[4]--
Madison County--
Orange County--
Spotsylvania County[5]270180

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"John Dawson, Esq. is re-elected for the district of Spotsylvanyia, etc. by a majority of 501 votes." The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). May 6, 1807.
[3]"John Dawson is re-elected by a majority of 504 votes over John Mercer." National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 11, 1807.
[4]"In Louisa County, Mr. John Dawson had a majority over his opponent Col. Mercer, of 178 votes." The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 17, 1807.
[5]"An election was yesterday held at the Court house in this county of a member for Congress, and state representatives. At the close of the polls the votes stood as follows:".

References:

The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 7, 1807.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 10, 1807.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 11, 1807.
The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 17, 1807.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 21, 1807.
Lynchburg Star (Lynchburg, VA). April 23, 1807.
Impartial Observer (Richmond, VA). April 25, 1807.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 5, 1807.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). May 6, 1807.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 11, 1807.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). May 14, 1807.
Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). May 16, 1807.
Wheeling Repository (Wheeling, WV). June 11, 1807.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.