[2]"John Clopton is re-elected a representative in the next Congress for the state of Virginia by a majority of 164 over Peyton Randolph." National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 1, 1807.
[3]"State of the Poll for Hanover...Majority for Clopton ~ 64, who is elected by a majority of 164 in the district." The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 24, 1807.
[4]The Kentucky Gazette and General Advertiser (Lexington, KY) and the The Enquirer (Richmond, VA) list Peyton Randolph with 181 votes.
[5]"Majority for Randolph, 155." The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 14, 1807.
References:
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 14, 1807.
Impartial Observer (Richmond, VA). April 18, 1807.
Lynchburg Star (Lynchburg, VA). April 23, 1807.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 24, 1807.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 24, 1807.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 1, 1807.
The Western World (Frankfort, KY). May 7, 1807.
Kentucky Gazette and General Advertiser (Lexington, KY). May 26, 1807.
Page Images
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society).
These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.
