Maryland 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 2

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 2
Date:
1816
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John C. Herbert, Joshua Barney, Joseph Kent
Candidates: John C. Herbert[1]Joshua BarneyJoseph Kent
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Final Result: 160215565
District of Two160215565
Anne Arundel County774972-
District of One[2]195188-
District of Two163161-
City of Annapolis100100-
District of Three30162-
District of Four107296-
District of Five279165-
Prince George's County[3]8285845
Town of Bladensburgh127102-
Town of Nottingham146146-
Piscataway31446-
Upper Malborough[4]13690-
Vansville105200-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Federal Republican and the Federal Gazette list 183 votes for Joshua Barney.
[3]The Maryland Gazette lists 829 votes for John C. Herbert.
[4]The Maryland Gazette lists 137 votes for John C. Herbert and the Alexandria Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA) lists 134 votes for Herbert.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Maryland Gazette and Political Intelligencer (Annapolis, MD). October 10, 1816.
Alexandria Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). October 11, 1816.
Baltimore Patriot and Evening Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 11, 1816.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 11, 1816.
Federal Republican and Baltimore Telegraph (Baltimore, MD). October 11, 1816.
Alexandria Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). October 12, 1816.
The Alexandria Herald (Alexandria, VA). October 16, 1816.
Maryland Gazette and Political Intelligencer (Annapolis, MD). October 17, 1816.
Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). October 19, 1816.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.