Maryland 1809 House of Delegates, Cecil County

Office:
House of Delegates (State)
Title:
Delegate
Jurisdiction:
State
Label:
Maryland 1809 House of Delegates, Cecil County
Date:
1809
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
House of Delegates/Delegate
Candidates:
Edward H. Veazy, John Groome, John Moffett, Henry W. Physic, William Howell, Levie Tyson, Thomas Grubb, Francis B. Chandler
Candidates: Edward H. VeazyJohn Groome[1]John Moffett[2]Henry W. Physic[3]William HowellLevie TysonThomas GrubbFrancis B. Chandler
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanRepublicanRepublicanFederalistFederalistFederalistFederalist
Final Result: [4][5][6]106110571056104210181010992967
Cecil County106110571056104210181010992967

Notes:

[1]Also referred to as Mr. Groom.
[2]Also referred to as Mr. Moffit.
[3]Also referred to as Mr. Pysick.
[4]The People's Monitor (Easton, MD),, October, 7, 1809; American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD), October 5, 1809; and The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD), October 5, 1809 Country Edition all list John Groome with 1063 votes.
[5]The Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA) lists Levie Tyson with 1016 votes.
[6]The Republican Star, or, General Advertiser (Easton, MD) lists Henry W. Physic with 1056 votes and John Moffett with 1042 votes.

References:

Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 4, 1809.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1809.
Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1809.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). October 6, 1809.
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). October 7, 1809.
Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). October 7, 1809.
The Maryland Republican (Annapolis, MD). October 7, 1809.
The People's Monitor (Easton, MD). October 7, 1809.
Republican Star or Eastern Shore General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 10, 1809.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.