Virginia 1809 U.S. House of Representatives, District 18

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1809 U.S. House of Representatives, District 18
Date:
1809
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Peterson Goodwyn, John Pegram
Candidates: Peterson Goodwyn[1]John Pegram
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [2]670280
District of Eighteen670280
Dinwiddie County[3]23598
Greenville County16961
Nottoway County[4][5][6]10993
Prince George County15728

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]North American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD) lists Peterson Goodwyn with a total of 321 votes for Greenville and Prince George counties (rather than 326 votes).
[3]The Enquirer (Richmond, VA) (April 28, 1809 edition) and New York Aurora (New York, NY) list 225 votes for Peterson Goodwyn, however the total of 670 votes for him for the district matches those newspapers giving Peterson Goodwyn 235 votes and therefore is likely a publishing error.
[4]The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD), Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD), National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC) and The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA) list 94 votes for John Pegram.
[5]The Enquirer (Richmond, VA) lists John Pegram with 94 votes in its April 11, 1809 edition, but by April 18, 1809 lists him with 93 votes.
[6]North American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD), The Republican (Petersburg, VA) (April 12, 1809 edition), and The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA) list John Pegram 97 votes.

References:

Original Poll List for Peterson Goodwyn at Nottoway Court House, 6th April 1809. The National Archives, Washington, DC
Original Poll List for John Pegram at Nottoway Court House, 6th April 1809. The National Archives, Washington, DC
Original Credentials of Peterson Goodwyn of Virginia for the Eleventh Congress, 23rd May 1809. The National Archives, Washington, DC
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 11, 1809.
The Republican (Petersburg, VA). April 12, 1809.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 14, 1809.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 14, 1809.
The Republican (Petersburg, VA). April 15, 1809.
The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 17, 1809.
Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD). April 17, 1809.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 17, 1809.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 18, 1809.
North American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 18, 1809.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). April 20, 1809.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 21, 1809.
The Republican (Petersburg, VA). April 22, 1809.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 24, 1809.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 28, 1809.
The Monitor (Washington, DC). May 2, 1809.
New York Aurora (New York, NY). May 2, 1809.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.