Maryland 1808 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1808 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5
Date:
1808
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Nicholas Moore, Alexander MacKim, William Winder
Candidates: Nicholas Moore[1]Alexander MacKim[2]William Winder
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [3][4][5][6]685766421818
District of Five685766421818
City of Baltimore[7][8]35523539814
Ward One552549167
Ward Two335330142
Ward Three[9]294293205
Ward Four[10]25625684
Ward Five[11]29429681
Ward Six51151071
Ward Seven71771746
Ward Eight59358818
Baltimore County[12][13][14][15]330531031004
Cheney's[16]1006987141
Collenberger's[17][18][19]298267174
Merryman's[20][21]244212142
Murray's[22]73973776
Nace's[23]26322795
Reister's Town[24]226198213
Towson's[25][26]529475163

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Elected.
[3]The Republican Star, or, General Advertiser (Easton, MD) lists 1813 votes for William Winder and 6853 for Nicholas Moore.
[4]The October 6th edition of the American and the October 7th edition of the North American lists 6853 votes for Nicholas Moore.
[5]The October 8th edition of the True American lists 1808 votes for William Winder. The October 11th edition corrected the error.
[6]The Whig lists 1822 votes for William Winder, 6928 votes for Nicholas Moore and 6632 votes for Alexander MacKim.
[7]The October 5th and 7th edition of the North American, the National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser, the Statesman, the The Columbian Phenix (Providence, RI), the True American, the Federal Gazette, the Democratic Press, The Albany Register (Albany, NY), the Aurora and the October 4th, 5th and 6th edition of the Whig list 3553 votes for Nicholas Moore.
[8]The October 5th edition of the American lists 3553 votes for Nicholas Moore and 3538 votes for Alexander MacKim.
[9]The October 4th edition of the Federal Gazette lists 298 votes for MacKim.
[10]The North American, the The Columbian Phenix (Providence, RI), the Federal Gazette, the Aurora, The Albany Register (Albany, NY), and the October 4th and 5th edition of the Whig list 255 votes for Nicholas Moore.
[11]The October 4th and 5th edition of The Whig, October 4th edition of the North American and the Federal Gazette and October 15th edition of the The Columbian Phenix (Providence, RI) list 296 votes for Moore.
[12]The October 7th edition of the American and the October 7th edition of the North American list 3300 votes for Nicholas Moore.
[13]The National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser lists 864 votes for William Winder, 2873 for Alexander MacKim, and 3052 for Nicholas R. Moore.
[14]The Whig lists 1008 votes for William Winder, 3375 votes for Nicholas Moore and 3093 for Alexander MacKim.
[15]The October 5th edition of the American lists 1008 votes for William Winder. 3175 votes for Nicholas Moore, and 3095 votes for Alexander MacKim.
[16]Referred to as the Western Precinct in the October 4th edition of the Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD).
[17]The October 5th edition of the North American lists 268 votes for Nicholas Moore and 257 votes for Alexander MacKim.
[18]The October 5th edition of the American lists 257 votes for Alexander MacKim.
[19]The October 7th edition of the True American lists 257 votes for Alexander MacKim.
[20]The October 7th edition of the American lists 239 votes for Nicholas Moore.
[21]The October 5th edition of the American lists 144 votes for William Winder.
[22]The October 5th edition of the North American and the October 7th edition of the True American list 789 votes for Nicholas Moore.
[23]Also referred to as Dug Hill.
[24]The October 5th edition of the North American, the October 7th edition of the True American and the October 5th and 7th edition of the American list 215 votes for William Winder.
[25]The October 5th edition of the North American, the October 5th edition of the American, and the October 7th edition of the True American list 500 votes for Nicholas Moore and 467 votes for Alexander MacKim.
[26]The October 5th edition of the Whig lists 500 votes for Nicholas Moore, 467 votes for Alexander MacKim and 164 votes for William Winder.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 4, 1808.
The North American and Mercantile Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 4, 1808.
The Whig (Baltimore, MD). October 4, 1808.
The Columbian Phenix (Providence, RI). October 5, 1808.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1808.
The North American and Mercantile Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1808.
The Whig (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1808.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 6, 1808.
Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 6, 1808.
The Democratic Press (Philadelphia, PA). October 6, 1808.
The Whig (Baltimore, MD). October 6, 1808.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 7, 1808.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). October 7, 1808.
The North American and Mercantile Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 7, 1808.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 7, 1808.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 8, 1808.
The Statesman (Newburyport, MA). October 10, 1808.
The Albany Register (Albany, NY). October 11, 1808.
Republican Star or Eastern Shore General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 11, 1808.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 11, 1808.
The Whig (Baltimore, MD). October 14, 1808.
The Whig (Baltimore, MD). October 3, 1810.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.