Maryland 1804 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1804 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5
Date:
1804
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Nicholas R. Moore, William MacCreery, Robert Goodloe Harper, John Stricker, Charles Ridgley, James MacHenry, George Buchanan, Edward Johnson, Clement Brooke, William Duncan, Jonathan Hughes
Candidates: Nicholas R. Moore[1]William MacCreery[2]Robert Goodloe HarperJohn StrickerCharles RidgleyJames MacHenryGeorge BuchananEdward JohnsonClement BrookeWilliam DuncanJonathan Hughes
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanFederalistRepublicanFederalistFederalistFederalistFederalistFederalistFederalist
Final Result: [3]293826721053413542111
District of Five293826721053413542111
Baltimore County[4]19521815102165-2111
Ward One39335930-22-2111
Ward Two17916710112-----
Ward Three20520726-21-----
Ward Four1831797--------
Ward Five1461405-1------
Ward Six2522481--------
Ward Seven31829916--------
Ward Eight2762167--------
Baltimore County9868573337-4----
District of One94752--------
District of Two13385-31-1----
District of Three166161---------
District of Four215189----1----
District of Five6959----2----
District of Six1981971--------
District of Seven11191-306------

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Elected.
[3]Because the Federalists ran only one candidate for Congress in the 5th District, many of them voted for Nicholas Moore as their second choice or voted for some other Federalist.
[4]The Eastern Shore Herald and Intelligencer lists 1795 votes for William MacCreery.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 2, 1804.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 2, 1804.
Herald and Eastern Shore Intelligencer (Easton, MD). October 9, 1804.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.