North Carolina 1800 Electoral College, Morgan District

Office:
Electoral College (Federal)
Title:
Elector
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1800 Electoral College, Morgan District
Date:
1800
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
Electoral College/Elector
Electors:
William Tate, Lawson Henderson
Electors: William Tate[1]Lawson Henderson
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Presidential Candidate:Thomas Jefferson / Aaron BurrJohn Adams / Charles Pinckney
Final Result: 1374484
District of Morgan1374484
Ashe County62-
Buncombe County[2]15626
Burke County427122
Lincoln County11240
Rutherford County36160
Wilkes County35736

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA) of December 1, 1800 lists William Tate with 155 votes.

References:

Compiled Election Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Weekly Advertiser (Raleigh, NC). November 18, 1800.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). November 26, 1800.
American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 27, 1800.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 27, 1800.
Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). December 1, 1800.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.