North Carolina 1825 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1825 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10
Date:
1825
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John Long, Jr., John Giles
Candidates: John Long, Jr.[1]John Giles
Affiliation:CaucusAnti-Caucus
Final Result: [2]32462889
District of Ten32462889
Chatham County[3][4]1239347
Davidson County579711
Clemmonstown572
Daniels12172
Hains192100
Hampton436
Lexington177391
Wards4170
Randolph County[5]1240147
Asheboro774
Bridge1944
Col. Lane's14113
Hoovers10845
Ingrams1353
Jo. Lanes13915
Johnstonville34830
Little River4933
Rowan County1881684
Barringer's334
Brickhouses's35100
Fulton3117
Haden's-70
Mocksville87302
Morgan's-73
Neely's8126
Salisbury42700
Thompson's10122

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Seth Beeson Hinshaw's Compilation lists John Long, Jr. with 3247 votes.
[3]Hillsborough Recorder (Hillsborough, NC) and The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC) list John Long, Jr. with 1245 votes and John Giles with 349 votes.
[4]The Carolina Observer (Fayetteville, NC) lists John Long, Jr. with 1245 votes.
[5]Seth Beeson Hinshaw's Compilation lists John Long, Jr. with 1241 votes.

References:

Original Election Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Western Carolinian (Salisbury, NC). August 16, 1825.
Hillsborough Recorder (Hillsborough, NC). August 17, 1825.
Carolina Observer (Fayetteville, NC). August 18, 1825.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 23, 1825.
Carolina Observer (Fayetteville, NC). August 25, 1825.
The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 26, 1825.
Republican Star, or, General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 18, 1825.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.